Not guilty on account of small dick

A unique legal strategy!

No, it’s not about Trump’s Senate trial.

A man said the woman who reported seeing his genitals was mistaken.

His barrister said the alleged act was “physiologically impossible.” He posed the “delicate question” to his client about his penis size, with an A4 piece of paper in front of him in court. He asked Mr Knight whether his manhood could get “anywhere close to coming over the top of that piece of paper.” He replied: “No.”