The site has more than a thousand videos, tagged with names, times and locations. Quite an amazing effort.
21 thoughts on “Some volunteers have assembled a massive site about January 6”
Comments are closed.
The site has more than a thousand videos, tagged with names, times and locations. Quite an amazing effort.
Comments are closed.
What is Steverino’s argument, exactly? Is he saying we should NOT have compiled evidence of the people who stormed the US Capitol building?
I guess he is saying he thinks it is unfair that the Capitol rioters were subjected to this kind of scrutiny while the people in the BLM protests – some of which involved rioting – were not.
A) Right wingers only talk about unfairness as it applies to them. When other people complain about unfairness, right-wingers generally say something like “The WORLD is unfair!” or, simply, “Fuck your feelings”.
B) The BLM marchers were protesting real grievances, i.e., the killing of minorities like George Floyd at police hands. Some other people, as far as anyone can tell, took advantage of the disturbances to riot and loot. Rioting and looting were not the OBJECT of the marches.
C) The Capitol rioters however, came to commit insurrection and murder. They brought a functional gallows. They killed a policeman. Their goal was to overturn the 2020 Presidential election. They did this based on the lie that President Trump actually won the election. He did not. No honest and rational person believed that he did. “Who actually won the 2020 Presidential election?” is a litmus test for whether a person is honest and rational or not.
D) Who actually won the 2020 Presidential election, Steverino? And was there ever any REAL question about it?
E) Steverino is now, after four years of Trumpspeak, pretending to be insulted by “Neanderthal”. Only the truth hurts, Steverino. That’s why Trump supporters were so butthurt when Hillary Clinton called them a “basket of deplorables”. Her only error was understatement.
F) Steverino is a liar and a mouthpiece for right wing poison. I would be surprised if he does NOT get paid for doing this by some organization or country. The only point in responding to him is to point out his lies and rain crap on him.
Oh, and PS – one of the reasons this CAN be done to the Capitol insurrectionists, as opposed to the BLM marchers, is that the Capitol rioters were stupid enough to take pictures and videos of themselves, because they thought insurrection and murder was going to work out fine for them. I.e., entitlement, stupidity, and believing their own propaganda. Because that’s the kind of chump that Trump appealed to.
Basically every conservative philosophy is deep rooted fear of change or thinking, or they’ve tied their personal identity to a fantasy reality of cultism or egoism, so start from that basis and expand outward.
Don’t question authority, even if it is corrupt, because it’s my ‘security.’ That’s why the conservative hivemind mostly bent over and took it from Trump, and even still does, because in the end they just want to stand in line and have someone think for them and attack anyone who questions authority.
Also, bitch about small anecdotal things because of insecurities, like Steverino talking about pronouns. Most people just say ‘ok live and let live, call what you want it to be called’ – but there’s quite a few insecure people on the right wing that apparently are threatened by simple non-starters like that. There were no ‘pronoun amendments’ in the stimulus that just happened, but the right wing nuts like to promote it’s some central policy or something, only because they’re triggered for some odd reason. Small penis syndrome or something maybe.
Finally, bitch about anyone different than you that you think is ‘gaming the system’ but ignore the ones in the board rooms that manipulate the entire world to their will. Half of the world’s ENTIRE wealth could fit inside an auditorium, yet these yokels are bitching about some Mexican immigrant getting a custodial or labor job for $7 an hour, or less under the table, and complain like the world is ending. And then talk about ’emotional facts.’
Yeah, geniuses, it’s not the 50% owning 50% of the wealth, but less the bottom 5%, much less 0.5% in some sort of Ayn Rand dystopia. It’s the VERY top of 500 that do it, and yet you have the visceral reaction of a toddler who got his rattle taken away from people like Steverino and other right wing nuts acting like the decline of the US is dependent on if some poor immigrant comes in and ends up cleaning bathrooms on a fucking weekend or something.
Lets hear more about logic though. I’m waiting for all those great studies on how that wealth is going to trickle down at any point now and how Trump’s tax cuts did anything except go DIRECTLY to stock buybacks for executives to hoard more money or corporations to buy competition to cut jobs and raise prices.
Both Indy and Roger sure like to paint with huge broad strokes. I don’t care about the BLM protests OR the Jan 6th block party. In both cases, the police should have just opened fire on anyone acting violently. We can do a body count afterwards. I don’t care why either group or any group was committing violence. I simply care that they committed violence and I have no interest in their feelings or root cause.
I also could not care less about who sleeps with who or what pronouns you WANT to be called by. I don’t care if you marry a sheep. What I do care about is being forced to use certain pronouns by the government. I care about books being burned and voices being silenced. I don’t care if a 1920s movie has blackface or is anti-semetic. I don’t care if there are singing ravens in dumbo. I don’t care what the washington football team is called. I don’t care about inflammatory speech on social media. In the words of Roger, “f@ck your feelings”.
You think you know the mind of a conservative? You think they are paranoid and selective? Tthe bottom line…. it’s all about tolerance for risk. Conservatives have very little tolerance. The extreme of right wing tolerance to risk is “paranoia”. The extreme of left wing tolerance to risk is “naïveté”. Everyone else falls somewhere else on the spectrum. Some conservatives are willing to kill innocent civilians overseas if it means eliminating strategic targets. Some liberals will knowingly allow strategic targets to fester because they do not want to hurt even one innocent civilian. If there is a .5% chance that an illegal, non vetted immigrant will harm a citizen, then a conservative will want to shut down all illegal immigration. Liberals are willing to allow that risk in order to offer assistance to those in need.
I know why liberals are liberals. I respect why they are liberals and I respect liberalism. However they are liberals because liberal policy helps them financially, provides more power, and aligns with their risk tolerance. Conservatives like conservative policy because it helps them financially, provides more power, and aligns with their risk tolerance. Why the hate? I don’t hate you. I just don’t agree with you. And I don’t agree with you because I thrive with less regulation, with lower taxes, more safety for my family, and the right to pursue my own concept of freedom (not yours).
Trump is no conservative. His ardent followers are not conservatives. Get over him already.
Your choice of regulation is selective though. Protective forces should be applied for consumers and citizens against those who are motivated by authoritarianism and greed in power. That doesn’t mean everything needs to be regulated to the point of absolute control, but how in your right mind could you claim that’s anywhere CLOSE to occurring? Anyone who wants to can get a gun and murder someone on a whim given the opportunity. We’re close to the first trillionaire in history – we have individuals making more that GDPs of entire COUNTRIES. Where is this alleged over-regulation? Individuals can and do kill whoever they want on a whim, and we allow individuals to hoard resources from society like minigods. What is this reality of regulation you live in?
Go look up Minamata disease and see what unchecked convenient ‘laissez faire-ness’ is in reality. No one seems to have a problem with the FDA or water supply regulatory committees making sure we don’t get salmonella or methylmercury in our food or water, but it sure seems to be selective as to what benefits who, as to what ‘counts’ as regulation.
That’s why I don’t like anti-regulation libertarians like yourself. Because the regulation is selective – if it benefits yourself, like the FDA or ‘regulating’ the actions of individuals to seize your property with force, then gee then it’s all fine. For everyone else, its Darwinism and the ‘invisible hand’ of the market.
If you get to utilize the knowledge and toil of others freely, such as the infrastructure built by public funding, non-profits, or research facilities – then its great. The way we’re communicating right now was funded by alleged ‘big government’ and is regulated by several committees and funded by non-profits. From the Javascript this site was written in, to the Hypertext protocol Tim Berners Lee made to create the web, to the TCP/IP protocol funded by the government through DARPA – we ALL stand on the shoulders of others.
And that’s what pisses me off, and why I don’t like people like you. You want true freedom? Go live in a commune and don’t touch anything anyone else has built. Or go live down with John McAfee in some lawless area where you’re not relying on public ‘regulation’ to protect your personal assets. Otherwise, you’re nothing but a hypocrite with your selective ‘freedom’ bullshit you libertarians like to promote. All is fair in personal benefit in taking from society or asking for selective protections, but the second that it’s about acting with humility and doing the same for others, then its the cold hard ‘invisible hand’ of the market or social Darwinism.
The more Steverino writes, the less I bother to read.
Amazing! Now we know the locations of and actions of every drunk moron from the January 6th block party. Where’s the site for the Portland riots? Or the Seattle occupation?
Do conservatives have any response to anything besides what-about-isms or is this basically the conservative canned response to everything nowadays?
There were more videos of police breaking the laws during the protests by hammering peaceful protestors than the small garbage fires and anecdotal Fox News bullshit people like you zoom in on and are easily manipulated by.
Not that this really represents peaceful protests anyway, since it’s been studied and proven well over 90% of the protests were peaceful, and the vast majority of arrests were for petty crime like obstructing traffic. Bottom line is, the Capital invasion WAS representative of the type of people who support conservative causes. Any destruction in protests were only representative that opportunists exist in any civil disorder situation.
I know the conservative/libertarian brain cell structure has shrunk to about amoeba levels now, but lets put this in perspective. Capital rioters were trying to overturn an election who’s ‘evidence’ consisted of ambulance chasers who couldn’t even file lawsuits with basic grammar – and nothing about the movement was promoted as being sensible or peaceful.
The protests last year were the response to the iron fist of corrupt authority in which people were killed in cold blood and caught on camera doing it. And then caught on camera again and again DURING the response utilizing the same corrupt arm of authoritarian force out of the PRC playbook. And there were a multitude of peaceful protestors who called out, reported, or even physically stopped opportunists who do not represent the cause in any way.
I know it’s a little nuanced, but yes, supporting corrupt authoritarianism and trying to overturn a legitimate election through violence supported by those in power is a little bit different than the common man’s response to it. But hey, what-about-isms are basically the official policy of conservatives at this point, so its not surprising anymore
Do liberals have any response to anything that isn’t driven by emotions first and logic second? Do they always have to project liberal collectivist theory and group think policies onto others?
Liberals always complain about sexual harassment but it’s always liberal men who are responsible. Liberals always scream about guns but an overwhelming majority of gun deaths are liberal on liberal shootings.
The trumpists on January 6th were “trying to overthrow the government” but the antifa thugs who attacked federal buildings are simply “misunderstood”. Conservatives only have one thing in common, the desire to live their life they want without interference from government. The conservative tent is far more accepting of different ideologies because they only band together to defeat one thing: never ending liberal social engineering.
The trumpists/deplorable/Neanderthals (aka blue collar workers) were all democrats. There is nothing conservative about them. These are your voters who you tossed out because you care more about illegal immigrants and gender pronouns than the lives of hardworking Americans.
It takes a very wealthy society to have the luxury of never ending, meaningless grievances. I assure you that when the mongol hoards were descending on villages, the villagers weren’t very concerned if someone was using the proper bathroom.
Lighten up Francis. Just because a loon wearing antlers and face paint sat in the speakers chair doesn’t make him Nancy pelosi.
“Do liberals have any response to anything that isn’t driven by emotions first and logic second? ” Yes – fixing the public health and economic wreckage caused by Fuckstick treating Covid like a PR problem.
“It takes a very wealthy society to have the luxury of never ending, meaningless grievances.” Yeah get that engraved on something and send it to Fox when they start in about Dr. Seuss or the goddam “war on Christmas”.
Great idea! I’ll send you royalties. Gotta love capitalism.
“Do liberals have any response to anything that isn’t driven by emotions first and logic second?”
Irony that you state this, when this is exactly projecting what conservatives do. Go look up psychological studies on the brain and fear emotions when conservatives are confronted with ‘uncomfortable’ changes, as compared to liberals.
It explains the irrational obsession conservatives have with obeying authority and who is sleeping with whom. That’s why taking a Dr Seuss book out of print no one would have ever noticed triggers you clowns. Just like the confederate statutes and 1000 other things that are only noticeable to those in a FOX News anger for profit segment so Hannity and Carlson can make a few more million off you clowns.
There’s some kind of irony about grievances to the party of propaganda that got us such greatest hits as complaining about Obama’s choice of mustard or the murder caravan from Central America.
We’re still waiting for those guns that were supposed to be taken away in martial law to defend against the terrorist Islamic extremist Central American socialist Hillary Obama blarghhsregrgdeaf rabble rabble …
What the new one now? We’re still waiting for the past 100 conservative lies that were to come to be, so I’ve lost track. Wait I’ll go take a walk downtown in one of the cities that was supposedly burning to the ground to bring on the Revelation apocalypse while you find the new lie to turn your brain off and believe in to create your own reality for you.
Indy – That first question of yours, that IS rhetorical, right?
SteveO – OK, I’ll play. Go ahead, compile your info about Seattle/Portland. Arrest those folks, I’m sure they’d LOVE their day in court. What were they up to? Not trying to toss an election, overthrow the government, and install a dictator, I bet.
Body count: Wingnuts – 6 (not counting doofus who had a heart attack; totally counting Portland guy kiled by that Trump-humper for being the wrong color. And George).
Moonbats – 0
Hey a shutout! Your traitor side wins!
Seattle and Portland don’t exist anymore, FOX News zoomed in on a protestor blocking traffic and a street corner garbage can fire, so obviously they’ve burned to the ground now.
They’ve been overtaken by the Central American caravan who are now occupying liberal socialist cities to enforce the Obiden martial law thats going into effect to take everyones guns and free speech and make everyone get Bill Gates 5G corona-tracking implant.
Duh, if you weren’t treating logic second, you would be able to see the super obvious conclusion here.
“January 6th block party”. We should forward that to the dead Capitol policeman’s widow. As the right gets more desperate, their true nature becomes more and more apparent.
If they only showed this interest in the riots by Antifa who cost us Billions and Billions of dollars.
It says a lot about you that you think you need to capitalize money.
That’s because they’re only interested in reality. Ever considered trying it?
Billions and Billions? Sagan is that you? I thought you’d croaked. Whatever, most of the monetary damage was by people who were pro-fire or out for free stuff. Antifa, less so. You might look into those III% jags, though – they like a nice torch.
Has to be a joke account with the Q anon letter there.
Guess cameras zooming in on trash fires and people getting arrested for blocking traffic is equal to ‘cities burning to the ground’ in conservative backwoods yokel reality.
I’m guessing these are the guys who grabbed everything that was stored on Parler.