Mimi Rogers naked in the Door in the Floor (2004)
Perhaps even more impressive, Mimi also did full rear nudity in that scene. It is highly unusual for an actress that age to allow the camera to take in a full rear shot in good light. Even more unusual: that butt looked pretty great. She was a competitive swimmer in her youth, and she kept that swimmers’ body for a long time.
Although she was competing against women young enough to be her daughters, Mimi earned the #2 spot among our best nude scenes of 2004. She probably would have won the poll in many years, but not 2004. The performance that beat her that year is arguably the greatest nude performance in history: Eva Green in The Dreamers.
That was not her only appearance among the top three of a year. Mimi finished third among the top nude scenes in 1995, for her epic nudity in Full Body Massage (sample here).
She swam competitively in the 9-10 age group in Aug ’64 and Jul ’65. She gave her age as 21 at her 1st marriage in ’76. Public records have this: Name Miriam A Rogers
Alias Mimi A Rogers
Previous Residence Los Angeles, CA
Previous Residence Postal Code 90049
Second Previous Residence Place Ione, California, United States
Third Previous Residence Place Los Angeles, California, United States
Residence Date from 1 Mar 1996 to 26 May 2005
Residence Place Los Angeles, California, United States
Birth Date 27 Jan 1955
Event Type Residence
Household Identifier 694279089
So 1955 is her birth year
She was 48 and wasn’t lying she was born in 1956,so don’t know where you came up with this bs
She was lying, as she has admitted.
But only by one year.
Details here, as corroborated by Mr Haney elsewhere in this thread.
Again does anyone know how to do math or am I missing something
“When I ask cautiously whether January 27, 1956 is the accurate date of her birth, she gives me a mischievous look and says, coyly: ‘The day and month are right, but the year isn’t. Let’s just leave it at that.’”
I do know now that the date is only off by one year. On July 13, 1965, she won a swimming competition in Tucson for girls 9-10. I believe she would be 9 fitting the quote. Your big mistake was having Mr Haney do your research.
“Or” is the wrong word in your opening sentence. It should be “and.” We have the math right “AND” you are missing something.
She won a competition for kids aged 9 or 10 in 1965, therefore she was born in 1955 or 1956.
Since she was not born in 1956 by her own admission, the only possibility is 1955.
—-
Even if you ignore her own words about not being born in 1956, the math produces the same result because of the other event in which she medaled. She also won a competition for kids aged 9 or 10 in 1964. Since she was in the same 9-10 bracket in both 1964 and 1965, she must have been 9 in 1964 and 10 in 1965, indicating that she was born in 1955. She also listed her age as 21 when she married in 1976, meaning that she had to have been born before 1956.
—-
Mr Haney’s search of the public records simply produces the same result, albeit without the math. (He’s just citing a reference which states outright that her legal birth year is 1955.)
And Mr. Haney certainly didn’t do research for me. He found the same publicly available information that I had cited when I wrote my original post several years ago. (He also found a bit more, but all of it leads to the same conclusion.)
By the way, even IMDb has now corrected her birth date to 1955.
I guess. I also was going on an article that her father was 25 when he had her and he was born in 1931 but that was probably wrong too. Sorry
The answer is you are missing something. “I believe she would be 9 fitting the quote” makes no sense. Facts matter, beliefs not so much. She competed in the 9-10 age group in August 1964 when she was nine and in July 1965 when she was 10. She gave her age at marriage in 1976 as 21 with no reason to lie. Your “research” seems to be reading Wikipedia. But don’t let facts get in your way. Cite some real evidence or admit your mistake
Even more amazing is that Rogers wasn’t 50 then. She admits to lying about her age. Best guess is by 5 years or so. She was probably 55