Rachel Bilson see-thru

8 thoughts on “Rachel Bilson see-thru”

1. Dear Warden, You were right. Salvation lies within.

2. It is on my monitor.

3. Nipples.

   Those would be nipples, Scoop.

   1. I think you may have hit the nail on the head. Perhaps we can get a biology professor in here to confirm. Preferably one expert in mammals.

      1. Note my answer to Mr. Dark, repeated below:

         It’s not that simple.

         You may be correct, but I’m exercising caution in making that call. I have some hesitation to declare that because the picture shows signs of tampering. Look at it in double size and you’ll see what I mean.

         Here is the original, legal image from Getty

         

         And here is that Getty image brightened to about the same level as the version on this post.

         

         As you can see, that reddish area is not there, and there is really nothing to suggest a nipple. I’m thinking that the one on this post is a very, very subtle fake.

   2. It’s not that simple.

      You may be correct, but I’m exercising caution in making that call. I have some hesitation to declare that because the picture shows signs of tampering. Look at it in double size and you’ll see what I mean.

      Here is the original, legal image from Getty

      

      And here is that Getty image brightened to about the same level as the version on this post.

      

      As you can see, that reddish area is not there, and there is really nothing to suggest a nipple. I’m thinking that the one on this post is a very, very subtle fake.

      1. The brightened version shows a more convincing nipple than the fake.

         I wondered why it was so red. No way is she sporting nips that red.

4. I’ll take it.

Comments are closed.