Well, sorta.

Wikipedia says, “When Blake Edwards remade the Peter Gunn television series as a feature film entitled ‘Gunn’ in 1967, Jackson was filmed in a nude scene that appeared only in the international version, not the U.S. release. Stills of the nude scene appeared in the August 1967 issue of Playboy magazine, in a pictorial entitled ‘Make Room For Sherry.’ The movie has not yet been released on VHS or DVD.”

It was Playboy that started that story about an alternate version of the film, and I believe the story is apocryphal. I have never seen that version offered for sale or download. I have never seen the actual nude scenes. I have never run into anyone who has seen any nude scenes from that film.

The scenes of Sherry on that bed were absolutely NOT shot on the set of the film. That bed pictured in the stills is a completely different bed from the one in the non-nude version of the film. Furthermore, the scenes of their interaction take place in Peter Gunn’s apartment, and it would make no sense for the Peter Gunn character, a manly private eye, to own a bed that looks like that, especially with pink beddings. (And in the context of the film, Gunn would not be in her bedroom, even if invited.) I am quite certain that the bedroom scene is just a standard pictorial filmed for the hefmag, and was never in any version of the film. To be fair to the bunnymag, the accompanying verbiage does not actually claim that those bedroom shots are from the film, although they seem to have intended people to infer that.

One mystery remains: where did this still come from?

The “pink bed” shots are clearly from a completely separate photoshoot having nothing to do with the film, but the frame above looks exactly like a scene in the film, and is clearly on the film set – except that Sherry is missing her top in this version. Did Playboy also have a photographer on set, as they did with several other films? That seems logical, but if Hef did have a man there, why is this the one and only picture that has emerged?