There are about ten female celebrities who are supposed to be hot, but whose appeal escapes me. Bella is one of those. In her case there may be the largest gap between the hype and (my) reality, because she has been touted as the world’s most beautiful woman. Sure, she has a nice figure which looks good in lingerie, but there are many stars and models with shapes just as good or better. And her face does nothing for me. I don’t even find her the most beautiful woman in her family, let alone the world.
Off the top of my head, I’d also place Millie Bobby Brown and Victoria Beckham in my “I don’t get it” club.
And while I think Emma Watson is really cute, I don’t get why some guys go ga-ga over her. Monica Bellucci, she ain’t. It must be because she grew up before our eyes. I guess Millie Bobby possesses that same mystique.
Which beauties don’t do it for you?
I fear that I’m going to get destroyed for this, but I just don’t think Sydney Sweeney is particularly attractive – great body, big natural tits, but her face is really pretty average. I also agree about Bella – I’d pick her sister over her nine times out of ten, and wouldn’t put either of them in the 10 most beautiful list.
Thou hast blasphemeth and must be smiteth
Most huge breasted blond women are boring to me, think Pamela Anderson.
Agreed. Bigger is better, until it isn’t. Maybe it’s not a coincidence that a bell curve is breast-shaped.
Margot Robbie. I just don’t get it. Oh, she’s got a pretty face, but I am at a loss as to why she is held out as the end-all, be-all of feminine hotness. She has small, just ok breasts, the rest of her figure is nothing special. Ho hum. Again, pretty face, but just not anything special to me.
Gal Gadot
Megan Fox and Angelina Jolie both look they were assembled from body parts of other beautiful women, but the parts don’t match up together. The effect has only gotten worse as they’ve aged and had more and more work done.
Agree on Emma Watson and Millie Bobby Brown. I think you need to be their age to get the appeal. Also, I can’t keep my Hadids and Thorns straight.
Megan Fox creeps me out most of the time.
Julia Roberts
She’d be pretty IRL, but not “Hollywood beautiful”
She maybe the most overrated ever. She had a pretty nice body not that we saw too much of it, but there was something wrong with her face. The hype machine that she was so unbelievably beautiful just shows how full of crap Hollywood can be.
While I don’t know if Kristen Bell is considered to be some kind of beauty, I really don’t understand why there seems to be a lot of interest in her from some guys. I guess it is just getting attached to them at a young age because she is mildly attractive and there is nothing sexy about her.
Kristin Bell is a very pretty petite blonde with an amazing personality. Compare her to Sarah Michelle Gellar, who is very similar looks-wise, but seems far more boring, or at least guarded in interviews.
See Bell on Ferguson…
I’ll happily watch almost anything with Kristen Bell. Yet I don’t think about her appearance at all.
Bella has had so much work done on her face that she looks like an alien attempting to masquerade as a beautiful woman. It’s just not quite right.
Candice Swanepoel is objectively very beautiful and yet she might be the most boring supermodel I’ve ever seen. It’s like she was designed by a committee.
The “beautiful but boring” club would have a very substantial membership. You could almost leave the “but” out of the name, because there are probably more beautiful boring women than beautiful interesting ones. The dazzling lookers don’t usually make very good talk show guests, although there are exceptions.
Taste is relative…it’s called “personal” taste for a reason.
While that’s true, it doesn’t override the concept of universal consensus. I think we would all agree that prime Halle Berry was more beautiful than Rosie O’Donnell.
Also the claim that Bella Hadid is the world’s most beautiful woman is supposedly based not on personal taste, but on objective measurements, which lays down some kind of scientific claim to universal consensus. They better re-work that science, because if we conducted a poll for the world’s most beautiful woman, I doubt that she would get even a single vote.
I suppose the real problem in Bella’s case is that the “most beautiful” claim drew undue attention to the fact that she obviously is not.
That claim brought out plenty of internet cynics who took a major dump on her, and probably caused her a lot of pain. If that claim had never been advanced, she could have just stayed in the shadows, enjoying her life.
Objective? …that looks like pseudoscience.