This denial obviously means nothing.
If you had no relationship with Moby, you would deny it
If you had a relationship with Moby, you would also deny it.
Plus she says she didn’t date him because she thought he was creepy? Have you seen the guy she married? Creepy is obviously her thing.
The legal experts have varying opinions.
To me it’s not a legal question at all, but a practical one. The answer is obviously “no,” because no conviction removes him from office, no matter how serious the crime. If President Trump, for example, held a Black Mass and sacrificed a virgin to Satan on the White House lawn, and were then convicted of murder, Trump would still be President of the United States, in charge of the nuclear codes, the military, the CIA, the FBI, etc. It doesn’t matter if he were on death row – he’d still be running the executive branch, and for all practical purposes, the country.
(And you know that Republican senators are still going to say that he was convicted by Obama judges and refuse to impeach him, even as he sits in The Big House.)
Oh, those Jews, or as I like to call them land-dolphins, because of their almost magical flipping ability.
If there’s one thing they do well, it’s pancakes! Not to mention baseball cards. And coins. And houses. If there is anything to be flipped, they are Johnny-on-the-spot.
Or would it be Yochanan on the spot?
He also called first-daughter Ivanka Trump “dumb as a brick.”
Steve, you have to stop pulling your punches!
Mr Bannon is not doing well at accepting his fall from grace.
This latest pic seems to be a full frontal of Bonnie Wright.
It seems that little Ginny Weasley is all grown up.
This Diane Lane topless scene was deleted from the final cut of Unfaithful (2002)
Lisa Appleton is a reality “star” in the UK
He’s not refusing to testify, but simply insisting that any congressional testimony he would provide would not go beyond his report. “We chose those words carefully, and the work speaks for itself, and the report is my testimony.”
Mueller sought to explain his thinking more fully. As an employee of the DOJ, he was bound by their guidelines. Therefore, he said a president “cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional.” And he noted, “Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view, that, too, is prohibited. Charging the president with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider.” The Constitution “requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse the president of wrongdoing.”
However …
“If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.”
Interesting BTS .gif of the actress who has been in multiple films in the Halloween series
The idea is that removing the color makes the nudity more prominent.
Maybe.
The joke:
Colbert addressing Trump: “The only thing your mouth is good for is being Vladimir Putin’s cock holster.”
According to Wolff, Mueller’s team drew up both the three-count indictment of Trump and a draft memorandum of law opposing an anticipated motion to dismiss.
Mueller’s spokesman has responded:
The special counsel’s spokesman actually said, “The documents that you’ve described do not exist.” The complication is that they do exist. Wolff has allowed journalists to see them, and says they are “based on internal documents given to me by sources close to the Office of the Special Counsel.”
Therefore, either the special counsel’s office is lying, or Wolff’s documents are forgeries, or some of Mueller’s underlings created them without his knowledge. The special counsel’s office has always shot straight, so it’s hard to believe they would lie now. If they are not forgeries, why was Mueller’s spokesman unaware of them and who created them? If they are forgeries, who forged them? Those questions are more interesting than Wolff’s actual book. It appears that there are more secrets waiting to be revealed.
Here’s the story from The Guardian.
